![]() |
|
|
Research by UQ students - Soudan St, West Toowong
|
Report
Menu Soudan Street is a relatively quiet and safe residential area with a leafy and historic ambience. It contains a strong, identifiable streetscape composed of traditional 1920s vernacular architecture, with the infusion of vegetation at one end. The primary function lies in the provision of a residential environment and in the access for pedestrian and vehicular movement. Within the street, two discrete, yet related environments may be found. The northern end is relatively sparsely treed and carries reasonable volumes of traffic, serving as a rat running route used to bypass Moggill Road. This area contains a special streetscape feature on the eastern side with a row of almost carbon copy 1920s styled houses with the same pyramid roofs, and front gables with a congruence and rhythm in form, mass, materials and compositive elements, which marks one side of the street. The southern end backs onto a creek and the entrance to a school. It has relatively dense levels of vegetation and has a cool and shady feel. It is a dead end and carries little through traffic, but does serve as a drop off point for children at school times. This end contains more mixed styles of houses and sites examples of 1920s, inter-war and post war detached housing, as well as a new medium density development. While differing, the houses still share common elements and features, although in this area alterations to the built form have led, somewhat, to the detriment of the original house form and composition. For example, the introduction of aluminum windows. The upper western side may also be subtly characterized by the prominence of the backyard open spaces, which form a channel at the back of allotments. Soudan street has a regular traffic flow from Bent to Orchard streets, which is a rat running route from to . The street, however, is not consequently particularly dangerous to the cyclist or the pedestrian. There is significant traffic noise at peak times of the day e.g. 7am to 9am. However, the feel of the street is still residential. The street
has a continuity of form, which leads to a distinguishable character.
There is a visual continuity in the streetscape, which stems from the
elements that compose that form. There is continuity in the repetition
of form, mass, spacing, structure, and materials, especially on the eastern
side. There is a continuity in the setbacks and fence heights, although
some instances do disrupt this.
Street divided into busy and quiet area - vegetated and sparsely vegetated. Most original structures in the street have been maintained Most renovations do not have a high impact on the original street form. Power poles on only one side of the street. Vegetation at the end of the street provides a focal point and contributes to the identity of that end which is characterized by the heavy prevalence of vegetation. Quiet street, which is generally safe to walk down Traffic is constant but is not dangerous. Accessible for cyclists and pedestrians. Bus route through street
Some bland fencing in vital places such as at the entrance at orchard and bent streets. Some renovations are not in keeping with the form and original elements of the street and are disruptive, such as aluminum windows, mixing of styles and inconsistent materials. Rat running route
Reasonable prominence of street parking cars in front of driveway Mixed character almost two or three zones Entirely residential mostly single detached housing, however it is candidate for medium density housing one existing example. Walking environment Relatively busy Safety at
night? General observations Most original structures have been retained. Street entirely residential Street subtly changes character from north to south.
Character determined by
Differences in character between areas Northern End Southern End - characterized by built form vs characterized by vegetation - carbon copy houses vs mixed styles - renovations supportive of style vs renovation not supportive - limited setbacks, limited veg. Vs deep setbacks with veg. - consistency in design vs inconsistency in design - busy, regular through traffic vs quiet, very little traffic
Architectural Elements (contributing to overall character) Roof form and pitch Hips Gables Building form and bulk Windows and doors (size, proportions and materials) Building materials
Setbacks - street, 3m? vs 6m? - side boundary, large vs small Fencing Significant variation in fencing style and materials. Some bland, some obscure view of house, some made of different materials, some comprise different styles. Most prevalent and suitable is the 0.9 1.2m paling fence.
Traffic High through traffic in the morning, but it is managed effectively by the presence of traffic islands at critical intersections. Rat running route - Orchard to Bent Street Bus route from Bent to Orchard Street.
Function & Safety Street is wide enough for parking both sides and a free flow of traffic. Street parking has reached a critical mass any more would be detrimental. Not ideal turn around area Link over creek to high school bridge finished in carriageway. Footpaths only exist north or Vera and Orchard streets. Pedestrian movement is fine getting to the bridge over the creek is safe. Most pedestrians use the eastern strip from the shops to the school or cross perpendicular to Orchard Street. Street is dark at night Power lines on one side of the street.
1.0 North-Eastern Strip:
photo montage to illustrate
2.0 Architectural Form:
separate illustrations for each element 3.0 Fences:
- Timber paling - No higher than 1.2m
4.0 Setbacks:
5.0 Vegetation:
6.0 Car parking:
7.0 Infill Developments:
enhance the existing and desired character of the area, as illustrated in the analysis of this report.
Thanks This work is the result of a group assignment , thus credit
for it should be given to John Rowell, Nick Park, Steven Mason and Sean
Cullen. Material may not be reproduced without permission from the owner. Home
| Newsletter | Events
| Report
|